Development & Reproduction
Korean Society of Developmental Biology
Short communication

Expression of Yolk Processing Enzyme Genes in Fertilized Eggs from Artificially Matured Female Eel, Anguilla japonica

Hyeon Ji Oh1, Jung-Hyun Kim2,3, Seong Hee Mun1, Jin Hui Kim1, Dae-Jung Kim2,3, Joon Yeong Kwon1,
Corresponding Author : Joon Yeong Kwon, Dept. of Aquatic Life Medical Sciences, Sunmoon University, Asan 31460, Korea. Tel: +82-41-530-2284, Fax: +82-41-530-2917, E-mail: jykwon@sunmoon.ac.kr

© Copyright 2018 The Korean Society of Developmental Biology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jul 31, 2018 ; Revised: Aug 27, 2018 ; Accepted: Sep 10, 2018

Published Online: Sep 30, 2018

ABSTRACT

Large quantity of eggs fail to be fertilized and many of fertilized eggs are unable to hatch in the eel, Anguilla japonica. Larvae of eel absorb egg yolk up to 8 days after hatching but the majority of hatched larvae die before they reach the stage of first feeding in this species. Genes of key enzymes for yolk processing (cathepsin B, D, L and lipoprotein lipase - abbreviated as ctsb, ctsd, ctsl and lpl, respectively) could be associated with egg quality. In this study, we investigated differences in the expression of these genes between floating eggs and sinking eggs, and also the relationship between the gene expressions of the enzymes and fertilization rates in the fertilized eggs obtained from artificially matured female eels. Expressions of yolk processing enzyme genes did not show significant difference between floating and sinking egg groups. Expression of ctsb decreased when fertilization rate was high. Expression of ctsd, ctsl and lpl, however, did not show any significant differences. These results suggest that ctsb expression could be an indicator of egg quality, and that some proteins prone to be digested by ctsb could be very important in the process of fertilization and normal cleavage in this species. Further study should identify these critical proteins to improve our understanding on the quality of fish eggs.

Keywords: Cathepsin; Lipoprotein lipase; Eel; Egg quality; Fertilization; Yolk

INTRODUCTION

Culture of eel Anguilla japonica totally depends on glass eel collected from the wild despites of the long time effort for more than 50 years to produce them artificially. Artificial production of glass eel has been succeeded in some laboratories of Japan (Tanaka et al., 2003) and Korea (Kim et al., 2013, 2014). However, survival rates of embryo and larvae are extremely low and still far from industrial scale. Large quantity of eggs in this species fail to be fertilized and many of fertilized eggs are unable to hatch. Larvae of eel absorb egg yolk up to 8 days after hatching but the majority of hatched larvae die before they reach the stage of first feeding (Ohkubo et al., 2008), indicating the importance of yolk processing in this species.

Many previous studies have reported that survival of fish embryos during early development could be associated with yolk processing by several proteases (Carnevali et al., 2001; Tingaud-Sequeira et al., 2011; Palomino et al., 2017). The key enzymes known to be involved in the process are cathepsins and lipoprotein lipase. Cathepsin family can be divided several subgroups accoding to the amino acids that degrade, including typical cysteine protease, cathepsin B and L, and an aspartate protease, cathepsin D (Duve, 1983; Roberts, 2005; Liaudet-Coopman et al., 2006). Recently, Palomino et al. (2017) showed that cathepsin can determine egg quality of a marine fish species. In yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi, mRNA expressions and enzyme activities of cathepsin B, cathepsin D and cathepsin L were associated with the survival of embryos during the early development (Palomino et al., 2017). In addition, during maturation, the key enzymes such as cathepsin B, D, and L were involved in the egg development and early embryonic development of fish (Carnevali et al., 1999a, 1999b, 2001, 2008; Kwon et al., 2001; Tingaud-Sequeira et al., 2011).

These enzymes seem to play the role by working on the hydrolysis process of egg yolk protein during embryonic development (Tingaud-Sequeira et al., 2011; Palomino et al., 2017). Transcripts of cathepsin B and D are produced and stored in oocytes during vitellogenesis in fish (Carnevali et al., 1993; Matsubara & Sawano 1995). After fertilization, the transcripts stored in the eggs are translated into enzymes that hydrolyze the stored yolk protein and supplies the energy and basic material needed for early development (Sire et al., 1994; Carnevali et al., 1999; Kwon et al., 2001; Hiramatsu et al., 2002; Tingaud et al., 2011). However, despite the importance of egg yolk processing, information on this process in eggs of eel is very limited.

A study has been reported on the importance of buoyancy (i.e., floating or sinking) of eggs in Japanese eel as a criterion for evaluating the quality of eggs (Unuma et al., 2005). In this study, we investigated differences in the expression of yolk processing enzyme genes between floating eggs and sinking eggs, and also the relationship between the gene expressions of the enzymes and fertilization rates in the fertilized eggs of this species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Induction of maturation and artificial fertilization

Eels were purchased from a private eel farm in Gochang, Korea (females 550–700 g, males < 500 g in body weight, b.w.) They were acclimated for 2 weeks at 20±1℃ without feeding in a 2,000 L indoor tank using filtered seawater before the beginning of hormone treatment for the induction of sexual maturation. Males were treated with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG; Daesung microbiological labs) at the dose of 1 IU/kg, b.w. Female eels were treated with salmon pituitary extract (SPE) at a dose of 20 mg/fish, once a week. After 10 to 15 injections, fish were measured for body weight. When fish were ready to spawn, 170 μL of 17, 20β-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one (DHP) was injected to each female in order to induce ovulation. Fish spawned about 15 hours after the injection. The eggs were artificially fertilized with sperm, and fertilization rate was examined.

2. Sampling procedure and RNA extraction

Fertilization eggs from each female were collected separately into 15 mL conical tubes after dividing the floating eggs and sinking eggs. All sampling procedure took less than an hour after fertilization. Eggs were stored at -80℃ until extraction. Total RNA was extracted from the stored eggs using TRIzol(r) Reagent (ambion, USA). Extracted total RNA was quantified using nanodrop-2000 (Thermo, USA) and used to synthesize cDNA.

3. Gene expression by Real-time PCR in eel egg

Transcript levels of cathepsin B gene (ctsb), cathepsin D gene (ctsd), cathepsin L gene (ctsl) and lipoprotein lipase gene (lpl) in the fertilized eggs of eel was investigated by real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) using cDNAs of floating or sinking eggs with different fertilization rate as templates. Primers for each gene were designed using Primer 3 software (version 2.2.3) (Table 1). Each RNA sample (1 μg) was revese transcribed using TOPscrit(tm) RT Dry MIX (Enzynomics, Korea). For RT-qPCR, 10 μL of 2X Pre-Mix SY BR Green (Enzynomics, Korea), 1 μL of each primer, 5 μL of cDNA template (50-fold dilution) and 3 μL of nuclease free water (NFW) were used. Sequence information of ctsb, ctsd, ctsl, lpl of eel used in the experiment was found in online databases http://molas.iis.sinica.edu.tw/jpeel/ and National Center for Biotechnology information (www.ncbi.nlm.gov).

Table 1. Primers for RT-qPCR of ctsb, ctsd, ctsl, lpl and β-actin for Japanese eel
Gene Primer sequence Product size
ctsb Forward 5′-AAGAACCCATTGTCACCCC-3′ 136 bp
Reverse 5′-GTGTCTATCAGCACGTCACTG-3′
ctsd Forward 5′-CAGGGAGAGTACATGGTTGAC-3′ 115 bp
Reverse 5′-GGGACTCCTTGAGAATGTACTG-3′
ctsl Forward 5′-GTGACCATGACGCTGTATTTG-3′ 104 bp
Reverse 5′-TTCCATGAGTCCCAATGCTC-3′
lpl Forward 5′-GATGTTTGCTATATTGTCGCTGG-3′ 115 bp
Reverse 5′-TCTCAAACATTCCACTCACCG-3′
β -actin Forward 5′-AGTATTTGCGCTCGGGTG-3′ 225 bp
Reverse 5′-CAGCCTTCCTTCCTGGGT-3′
Download Excel Table
4. Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean±SEM. Statistical difference of the expression levels between floating eggs and sinking eggs was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and independent two-sample t-test (p<0.05). The relationship between the expressions of yolk processing enzyme genes (ctsb, ctsd, ctsl, lpl) and fertilization rate were shown by regression analysis. Statistical analyses were preformed using SPSS version 18.0.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Expressions of yolk processing enzyme genes did not show significant difference between floating and sinking egg groups in Japanese eel in this study (Fig. 1). This result contradicts the results from other fish species. In gilthead seabream Sparus aurata, cathepsin D activity was higher in sinking eggs than in floating eggs (Carnevali et al., 1999). In European seabass Dicentrarchus labrax, cathepsin D gene was expressed significantly higher level in the sinking eggs, while cathepsin L gene showed a higher expression in the floating eggs (Carnevali et al., 2001).

dr-22-3-289-g1
Fig. 1. Differencial expression of yolk processing enzyme genes between floating egg and sinking egg group in Japanese eel. (A) cathepsin B gene (ctsb), (B) cathepsin D gene (ctsd), (C) cathepsin L gene (ctsl), (D) lipoprotein lipase gene (lpl). There were no significant difference in the expressions of cathepsin and lipoprotein lipase genes between floating egg and sinking egg group (p>0.05).
Download Original Figure

In general, buoyancy of normal healthy eggs differs from species to species in fish. Eggs from salmonid fish are demersal. Sinking eggs are considered to be good in this kind of fish. Eggs from seabream, seabass and many marine fish species are buoyant, and floating eggs with low expression of cathepsin D are considered to be good. In this study, we assumed the floating eggs as good quality and sinking eggs as bad quality, based on the suggestion from Unuma et al (2005). It was expected that the floating eggs of eel would show low expression of ctsd and high ctsl. This discrepancy between the results and expectation might indicate that the mechanism of buoyancy acquirement in eel eggs could differ from the mechanism in other marine fish species. This potential difference of the mechanism could be attributed to the catadromous characteristics of eel.

Another possibility for the unexpected results could be the potential existence of tissue specific transcript variants for the enzymes. The sequences used to design the primers for each enzymes were not originated from ovarian or egg cDNA library. It is possible that egg specific transcripts for yolk processing enzymes would have shown clear differential expression between floating and sinking eggs if there were tissue specific isoforms for each enzyme gene.

Fertilization rates of eggs from 5 different females were different to each other, ranging from 36.0% to 76.0%. Expression level of ctsb decreased significantly as the fertilization rate increased (p<0.05) (Fig. 2A). However, expression levels of ctsd and ctsl did not show significant any relationships with fertilization rate (p>0.05) (Fig. 2B & 2c). Expression level of lpl tended to increase as fertilization rate increases, but showing no statistical significance (p>0.05) (Fig. 2D). In support of this result, the level of ctsb has been suggested to be a criterion for egg quality in yellowtail kingfish and red spotted grouper (Gwon et al., 2017; Palomino et al., 2017). However, they focused on the difference between developmental stages while, in this study, we have looked into differences between egg groups with different fertilization rate. This could mean that our result tells more directly the quality of eggs. Thus, the level of ctsb transcript in eggs could be considered as a potential marker for evaluating egg quality, but not the level of ctsd, ctsl and lpl in this species. High fertilization rate, however, does not always result in high hatching rate and survival rate at the post-embryonic stage. Further study should investigate the relationship between yolk processing enzymes and hatching rate or post-embryonic survival.

dr-22-3-289-g2
Fig. 2. Relationship of expressions of yolk processing enzyme genes with fertilization rate in the eggs of eel. (A) Regression analysis showed that the expression level of ctsb decreased as the fertilization rate increased (p<0.05), (B) & (C) No significant relationship was found between fertilization rate and either the expression of ctsd or ctsl (p>0.05). (D) Transcript of lpl tended to increase as the fertilization rate increased, although not significant (p>0.05).
Download Original Figure

In summary, these results suggest that ctsb expression could be an indicator of egg quality, and that some proteins prone to be digested by cathepsin B could be very important in the process of fertilization and normal cleavage in this species. Concentration of the proteins would be high leading to successful fertilization when the activity of cathepsin B is low in the eggs of the eel. Further study should identify these critical proteins to improve our understanding on the quality of fish eggs. In further studies, other enzymes which are also involved in yolk processing at early embryonic stages need to be investigated. In addition, possibility of tissue specific splicing for yolk processing enzyme genes should be investigated.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03035764).

REFERENCES

1.

Carnevali O, Carletta R, Cambi A, Vita A, Bromage N. 1999a; Yolk formation and degradation during oocyte maturation in seabream Sparus aurata: Involvement of two lysosomal proteinases. Biol Reprod. 60:140-146

2.

Carnevali O, Centonze F, Brooks S, Marota I, Sumpter JP. 1999b; Molecular cloning and expression of ovarian cathepsin D in seabream, Sparus aurata. Biol Reprod. 61:785-791

3.

Carnevali O, Cionna C, Tosti L, Cerda J, Gioacchini G. 2008; Changes in cathepsin gene expression and relative enzymatic activity during gilthead sea bream oogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev. 75:97-104

4.

Carnevali O, Mosconi G, Cambi A, Ridolfi S, Zanuy S, Polzonetti-Magni AM. 2001; Changes of lysosomal enzyme activities in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) eggs and developing embryos. Aquaculture. 202:249-256.

5.

Carnevali O, Mosconi G, Roncarati A, Belvedere P, Limatola E, Polozoneni-Magni AM. 1993; Yolk protein changes dying oocyte growth in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax L. J Appl Ichthyol. 9:175-194.

6.

de Duve C. 1983; Lysosomes revisited. FEBS J. 137:391-397.

7.

Gwon SH, Kim HK, Baek HJ, Lee YD, Kwon JY. 2017; Cathepsin B & D and the survival of early embryos in red spotted grouper, Ephinephelus akaara. Dev Reprod. 21:457-466

8.

Hiramatsu N, Ichikawa N, Fukada H, Fujita T, Sullivan CV, Hara A. 2002; Identification and characterization of proteases involved in specific proteolysis of vitellogenin and yolk proteins in salmonids. J Exp Zool. 292:11-25

9.

Kim DJ, Lee NS, Lee BI, Kim SK, Kim KK. 2013; Development changes in the external structure of the head and the histological structure of the eye in artificially reared Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, leptocephalus and glass eel. J Life Sci. 23:1288-1294.

10.

Kim DJ, Lee NS, Kim KK, Chang DS. 2014; Effects of starvation, water temperature, and water flow on the metamorphosis of leptocephalus of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. Fish Aquatic Sci. 47:597-602.

11.

Kwon JY, Prat F, Randall C, Tyler CR. 2001; Molecular characterization of putative yolk processing enzymes and their expression during oogenesis and embryogenesis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Biol Reprod. 65:1701-1709

12.

Liaudet-Coopman E, Beaujouin M, Derocq D, Garcia M, Glondu-Lassis M, Laurent-Matha V, Prebois C, Rochefort H, Vignon F. 2006; Cathepsin D: Newly discovered functions of a longstanding aspartic protease in cancer and apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 237:167-179

13.

Matsubara T, Sawano K. 1995; Proteolytic cleavage of vitellogenin and yolk proteins during vitellogenin uptake and oocyte maturation in barfin flounder (Verasper moseri). J Exp Zool. 272:34-45.

14.

Ohkubo N, Sawaguchi S, Nomura K, Tanaka H, Matsubara T. 2008; Utuilization of free amino acids, yolk protein and lipids in developing eggs and yolk-sac larvae of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica. Aquaculture. 282:130-137.

15.

Palomino J, Herrera G, Torres-Fuentes J, Dettleff P, Patel A, Martinez V. 2017; Assessment of cathepsin mRNA expression and enzymatic activity during early embryonic development in the yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi. Anim Reprod. 180:23-29.

16.

Roverts R. 2005; Lysosomal cysteine proteases: Structure, function and inhibition of cathepsin. Drug News Perspect. 18:605-614

17.

Sire MF, Babin PJ, Vernier JM. 1994; Involvement of the lysosomal system in yolk protein deposit and degradation during vitellogenesis and embryonic development in trout. J Exp Zool. 269:69-83.

18.

Tanaka H, Kagawa H, Ohta H, Unuma T, Nomura K. 2003; The first production of glass eel in captivity: Fish reproductive physiology facilitates great progress in aquaculture. Fish Physiol Biochem. 28:493-497.

19.

Tingaud-Sequeira A, Carnevali O, Cerda J. 2011; Cathepsin B differential expression and enzyme processing and activity during Fundulus heteroclitus embryogenesis. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 158:221-228

20.

Unuma T, Kondo S, Tanaka H, Kagawa H, Nomura K, Ohta H. 2005; Relationship between egg specific gravity and egg quality in the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. Aquaculture. 246:493-500.