Short communication

Generation of mmp15b Zebrafish Mutant to Investigate Liver Diseases

Oc-Hee Kimhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2553-7157, Hye Suck Anhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6906-3518, Tae-Young Choihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1810-5292
Author Information & Copyright
Dept. of Genetic Resources Research, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon 33662, Korea
Corresponding Author :Hye Suck An, Dept. of Genetic Resources Research, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon, Chungnam 33662, Korea. Tel: +82-41-950-0753, Fax: +82-41-950-0765, E-mail: mgran@mabik.re.kr, Tae-Young Choi, Dept. of Genetic Resources Research, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Seocheon, Chungnam 33662, Korea. Tel: +82-41-950-0779, Fax: +82-41-950-0765, E-mail: choity@mabik.re.kr

© Copyright 2019 The Korean Society of Developmental Biology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Oct 18, 2019 ; Revised: Oct 21, 2019 ; Accepted: Nov 09, 2019

Published Online: Dec 31, 2019

ABSTRACT

Upon gene inactivation in animal models, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) has become a useful model organism for many reasons, including the fact that it is amenable to various forms of genetic manipulation. Genome editing is a type of genetic engineering in which DNA is inserted, deleted, modified, or replaced in the genome of a living organism. Mainly, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) Cas9 (CRISPR-associated protein 9) is a technology that enables geneticists to edit parts of the genome. In this study, we utilized this technology to generate an mmp15b mutant by using zebrafish as an animal model. MMP15 is the membrane-type MMP (MT-MMP) which is a recently identified matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) capable of degrading all kinds of extracellular matrix proteins as well as numerous bioactive molecules. Although the newly-established mmp15b zebrafish mutant didn’t exhibit morphological phenotypes in the developing embryos, it might be further utilized to understand the role of MMP15 in liver-related diseases, such as liver fibrosis, and associated pathogeneses in humans.

Keywords: mmp15b; Zebrafish; Liver diseases; Regeneration; Fibrosis; CRISPR/Cas9

INTRODUCTION

Before the application of CRISPR/Cas9(clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9) technology in the zebrafish research field, targeted gene knockouts were not possible in zebrafish, and its utility for validation studies of candidate genes was limited. At that time, researchers using the zebrafish animal model have been experienced difficulty using ENU technology to generate mutants for interesting genes. This challenge was eliminated with the development of novel gene targeting approaches including ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9 (Bedell et al., 2012; Jinek et al., 2012; Mali et al., 2013; Hsu et al., 2014; Varshney et al., 2015). Among these, the CRISPR/Cas9 approach now offers an efficient method to target any gene of interest. Although off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas9 technology remains a hurdle for consideration, several screens and engineering methods have been developed to reduce genome-wide off-target mutations including nuclease mutation, protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence modification, single guide RNA (sgRNA) truncation and novel nuclease discovery. For example, Kleinstiver et al. (2015, 2016) recently reported that manipulation of the Cas9 protein (i.e., SpCas9) and sgRNA target not only improved specificity but also reduced off-target effects (Fu et al., 2014).

Matrix metallopeptidases, also known as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), are metalloproteinases that are calcium-dependent, zinc-containing endopeptidases. These enzymes are capable of degrading all kinds of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, but can also process numerous bioactive molecules. The most common categorizations of MMP are partly based on the historical assessment of substrate specificity and cellular localization of MMP, which include collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, and membrane-type MMPs (MT-MMPs). Among them, MT-MMPs constitute a growing subclass of recently identified MMPs; however, MT-MMPs are yet to be fully understood. Previously, Choi et al. (2017) reported that mmp15b was highly expressed in the regenerating liver after severe hepatocyte ablation. In addition, MMPs are involved in the degree of initial injury and repair, the onset and resolution of inflammation, the activation and deactivation of myofibroblasts, and the deposition and breakdown of ECM. In other words, MMPs are involved in both augmenting and attenuating many processes that impact fibrosis (Giannandrea & Parks, 2014). Thereby, a zebrafish mutant model of mmp15b would be an effective tool to investigate the underlying mechanism during liver fibrosis after severe hepatocyte injury.

In this study, we generated a zebrafish mmp15b mutant using CRISPR/Cas9 technology as a model to explore liver disease with human fibrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Zebrafish

We used wild type (TÜ and AB) zebrafish. Wild-type zebrafish were obtained from the Zebrafish Center for Disease Modeling (ZCDM). Embryos and adult fish were raised and maintained under standard laboratory conditions (Westerfield, 2000).

2. Zebrafish reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

cDNA from embryos at various stages (as indicated in Fig. 1) was used as a template for PCR to amplify mmp15a and mmp15b genes. The primer sequences, mmp15a (407 bp) and mmp15b (556 bp), used for RT-PCR were 5’-GACTTCATGGGATGCCGAGT-3’, 5’-ACGACAAGGTGTGTGTCTCG-3’, and 5’-CCGGTTACCCTCAAGAGCTG3’, 5’-GTGCGCTCCGTCTCATCTAT-3’; respectively.

dr-23-4-385-g1
Fig. 1. Developmental expression of mmp15b mRNA. Differential mRNA expression of mmp15b in the developing zebrafish embryo. RNA extracted from the embryo at the indicated embryonic stage was used for RT-PCR analysis. RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
Download Original Figure
3. Generation of the mmp15b mutant line

mmp15b sgRNAs (5’-ATGACCCGTTCACGTTGCTGTGG-3’ and 5’-TTGATGGGTGCGCGCACCTTTGG-3’) were generated as previously described (Irion et al., 2014). mmp15b target sequences are located in exon 1. mmp15b gRNAs (500 ng each) and Cas9 protein (1 ug) were mixed and injected into 1-cell stage embryos which were raised to adulthood. Cas9 protein was purchased from Toolgen. Either the adult zebrafish tail fin or the whole embryo at 1–2 dpf was used to obtain genomic DNA for PCR-mediated genotyping. PCR products were sequenced to identify frameshift mutation. F1 fish containing a 14 bp deletion were selected to establish the mmp15b mutant line.

4. Genotyping of mmp15b mutants

For mmp15b genotyping, genomic DNA was amplified with the forward (5’-GATCCCGGTGGGAATGATGGC-3’) and reverse (5’-AGAACCCTGTAGAACTGACTTG-3’) primers. The wild-type allele generates a band of 148 bp, whereas the mmp15b mutant allele generates a band of 134 bp.

Results and Discussion

We recently established a zebrafish liver regeneration model in which severe hepatocyte loss resulted in the regeneration of hepatocytes from BECs. Using this model, we performed RNA-Seq analysis to identify pathways or factors involved in the regulation of liver regeneration (Choi et al., 2017). Among them, we selected mmp15b which was highly expressed in early liver regeneration. MMPs are a family of extracellular endopeptidases defined by conserved catalytic domains (Ra & Parks, 2007) and have long been considered to be primarily responsible for turnover and degradation of ECM substrates. However, they are now recognized for immunity and repair; being involved in such processes as cell migration, leukocyte activation, antimicrobial defense, chemokine processing and more (Yoshifum, 2015). Thereby, mmp15b might play a regulatory role in zebrafish liver regeneration or liver fibrosis.

Due to genome duplication in zebrafish, we found that two mmp15 genes, mmp15a and mmp15b, searched. We first examined the expression pattern of mmp15 genes during development. Expression of mmp15a and mmp15b was detected as early as 10 hpf (hour post-fertilization), indicating zygotic but not maternal expression (Fig. 1). Based on their expression patterns, mmp15a and mmp15b likely play an important role in normal animal development and in other physiological settings. Of note, gene expression profiling after RNA-Seq analysis during early liver regeneration showed that mmp15b was highly induced in the regenerating liver, whereas mmp15a was not (Choi et al., 2017). These results suggest a role of mmp15b during liver regeneration.

We generated mmp15b zebrafish mutant utilizing CRISPR/Cas9 technology which is a simple yet powerful tool for editing genomes by altering DNA sequences and modifying gene function. We first designed sgRNAs (Fig. 2B) after predicting the critical domain of Mmp15b (Fig. 2A). As an MT-MMP, the Mmp15b protein contains a membrane linker, cytoplasmic tail, and catalytic domain for the degradation of ECM substrates (Fig. 2A). Therefore, we synthesized two sgRNAs in exon 1 of mmp15b (Fig. 2B) and tested the efficiency by co-injecting with Cas9 protein into one-cell stage embryos. After performing T7E1 assay for DNA sequence mismatch in co-injected embryos, we found that the sgRNAs efficiently generated mismatched DNA, suggesting successful generation of the mmp15b mutant zebrafish (Fig. 2C).

dr-23-4-385-g2
Fig. 2. Generation of the mmp15b mutant in zebrafish. (A) Scheme of predicted domains for the Mmp15 protein. The main domain for the Mmp15b protein is shown in the green box, which is a catalytic domain with zinc ion binding. Mmp15b possesses membrane linker and cytoplasmic domains as an MT-MMP. (B) To generate mmp15b mutant zebrafish, two sgRNAs with PAM sequence were designed for exon 1 of the mmp15b gene. (C) To check the efficiency of the sgRNAs, we co-injected sgRNA and Cas9 protein. Co-injected embryos showed that the two sgRNAs efficiently generated mismatched DNA when T7 endonuclease I (T7E1) assay was performed. MT-MMP, membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase; PAM, protospacer adjacent motif; sgRNA, single guide RNA.
Download Original Figure

The resulting mismatched DNA from the two sgRNAs suggested germline transmission and were used to generate the mmp15b knockout mutation (Fig. 2C). To determine the role of Mmp15b, we examined (1) outcross with wild type raised to adulthood and (2) identification of mutation by PCR and DNA sequencing in the F1 zebrafish (Fig. 3). We performed PCR after isolation of genomic DNA from 42 zebrafish offspring (Fig. 3B bottom). Approximately 52% (22/42) of zebrafish offspring were mmp15b knockout mutants showing 13, 14, or 16 bp deletions, suggesting that frameshift occurred in the 22 F1 zebrafish (Fig. 3B). Frameshift mutation of mmp15b resulted in termination-site change and early termination of the Mmp15b protein, indicating that the Mmp15b variant was generated with 32 amino acid of the Mmp15b protein. Of note, the mmp15 mutant exhibited no obvious morphological phenotypes in the developing embryo or adult (data not shown). Despite the absence morphological changes, the mmp15b mutant would be a useful tool for the study of liver regeneration. The zebrafish liver is fully functional by day 5, which provides us an opportunity to investigate liver regeneration by combining other transgenic fishes; namely hepatocyte ablation lines, e.g., fabo10a:CFP-NTR, or macrophage ablation lines, such as mpeg1:NTR-mCherry. As our mmp15b mutant zebrafish could be utilized in this regard, future experiments would be of interest to explore the role of mmp15b underlying fibrosis mechanism during liver regeneration.

dr-23-4-385-g3
Fig. 3. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing for mmp15b resulted in germline transmission in zebrafish. (A) Most F0 individuals, when raised to adulthood, transmitted the mmp15b knockout mutation to their offspring, demonstrating a very high efficiency of targeted mutagenesis in both soma and germline. (B) Sequencing after mmp15b PCR found that F1 individuals exhibited 13, 14, or 16 bp deletions, thereby frameshift mutation of mmp15b resulted in change of termination-site and early termination of Mmp15b protein. The Mmp15b variant is generated with 32 amino acids of the Mmp15b protein. CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats; Cas9, CRISPR-associated protein 9.
Download Original Figure

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by National Marine Biodiversity Institute Research Program [2020M00600] and the Collaborative Genome Program of the Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF) (No. 20180430).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Kim OH, An HS, Choi TY

Data curation: An HS, Choi TY

Formal analysis: An HS, Choi TY

Methodology: Kim OH, Choi TY

Software: Kim OH, Choi TY

Validation: Kim OH, Choi TY

Investigation: Kim OH, Choi TY

Writing original draft: An HS, Choi TY

Writing review & editing: An HS, Choi TY.

ETHICS APPROVAL

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

REFERENCES

1.

Bedell VM, Wang Y, Campbell JM, Poshusta TL, Starker CG, Krug RG, Tan W, Penheiter SG, Ma AC, Leung AYH, Fahrenkrug SC, Carlson DF, Voytas DF, Clark KJ, Essner JJ, Ekker SC. 2012; In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature. 491:114-118

2.

Choi TY, Khaliq M, Tsurusaki S, Ninov N, Stainier DYR, Tanaka M, Shin D. 2017; Bone morphogenetic protein signaling governs biliary-driven liver regeneration in zebrafish through tbx2b and id2a. Hepatology. 66:1616-1630

3.

Fu Y, Sander JD, Reyon D, Cascio VM, Joung JK. 2014; Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 32:279-284

4.

Giannandrea M, Parks WC. 2014; Diverse functions of matrix metalloproteinases during fibrosis. Dis Model Mech. 7:193-203

5.

Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. 2014; Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 157:1262-1278

6.

Irion U, Krauss J, Nüsslein-Volhard C. 2014; Precise and efficient genome editing in zebrafish using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Development. 141:4827-4830

7.

Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. 2012; A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 337:816-821

8.

Kleinstiver BP, Pattanayak V, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, Joung JK. 2016; High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature. 529:490-495

9.

Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Topkar VV, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, Gonzales AP, Li Z, Peterson RT, Yeh JR, Aryee MJ, Joung JK. 2015; Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature. 523:481-485

10.

Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, Dicarlo JE, Norville JE, Church GM. 2013; RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 339:823-826

11.

Ra HJ, Parks WC. 2007; Control of matrix metalloproteinase catalytic activity. Matrix Biology. 26:587-596

12.

Varshney GK, Sood R, Burgess SM. 2015; Understanding and editing the zebrafish genome. Adv Genet. 92:1-52

13.

Westerfield M. 2000 The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). University of Oregon Press. Eugene: .

14.

Yoshifum I. 2015; Membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases: Their functions and regulations. Matrix Biol. 44-46:207-223